|
Ratings and Reviews: |
Number
of Ratings: 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
0% |
0% |
33% |
33% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
33% |
|
Weighed
Average (?): (5.5/10) |
Average
Rating: (6/10) |
Highest
Rating: (10/10) |
Lowest
Rating: (3/10) |
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
H Dean
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Nov 27, 2005 |
|
Run on sentences, commas where they should not exist and no commas where they should are a prime example of the numerous grammatical errors that kept this story from having any sort of flow. This is to say that I back tracked numerous times to make certain I got the gist of many sentences. I might have managed to enjoy this story had these problems not been so common. As it was, I could not. (3/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
tiffany love
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Sep 20, 2005 |
|
Superbe story. Even though the grammar could use some work, the story is great (10/10)
|
|
|
|
|
Reviewer:
Moggy
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Oct 11, 2003 |
|
Has some potential but there are far too many spelling and grammatical errors. I wanted to like it but the language issues defeated me. (4/10)
|
|
|