|
| Ratings and Reviews: |
| Number
of Ratings: 3 |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
| 0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
33% |
33% |
0% |
33% |
0% |
0% |
|
Weighed
Average (?):  (6/10) |
Average
Rating:  (6.5/10) |
Highest
Rating:  (8/10) |
Lowest
Rating:  (5/10) |
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
bullfinch
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Sep 3, 2008 |
| |
Well written. Interesting scenario. (8/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
mkemse
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Aug 19, 2007 |
| |
not bad, no great great about average (6/10)
|
|
|
|
|
| Reviewer:
Wistan
(Edit) |
Rating: |
Jan 17, 2006 |
| |
Not a bad effort. Gets straight to the point and is pretty direct. I don't think that doing the whole thing in monologue form was a very good choice - what was the point, really? It means that the main character has to explain everything that's going on, and that makes it sound odd because that's just not the way people talk.
The author does a pretty good job within that limitation, but it would have been much better to have put some dialogue from other characters and some descriptive passages in. (5/10)
|
|
|
About 